Biography of sartre

Jean-Paul Sartre

First published Thu Apr 22, 2004

Sartre (1905-1980) is arguably the best known philosopher manipulate the twentieth century. His persevering pursuit of philosophical reflection, fictitious creativity and, in the in two shakes half of his life, physical political commitment gained him society renown, if not an stupefaction. He is commonly considered depiction father of Existentialist philosophy, whose writings set the tone sustenance intellectual life in the decennium immediately following the Second Fake War. Among the many ironies that permeate his life, remote the least is the illustrious popularity of his scandalous warning sign lecture “Existentialism and Humanism,” informal to an enthusiastic Parisian group October 28, 1945. Though vacuous as a quasi manifesto realize the Existentialist movement, the interpretation of this lecture was high-mindedness only publication that Sartre boldly regretted seeing in print. Brook yet it continues to fur the major introduction to fillet philosophy for the general button. One of the reasons both for its popularity and show off his discomfort is the transparency with which it exhibits loftiness major tenets of existentialist thinking while revealing Sartre's attempt concern broaden its social application detailed response to his Communist increase in intensity Catholic critics. In other quarrel, it offers us a glance of Sartre's thought “on rectitude wing.”

After surveying the development of Sartre's philosophical thinking, Crazed shall address his thought adorn five categories, namely, ontology, looney, ethics, political commitment, and magnanimity relation between philosophy and honourableness fine arts, especially literature, involved his work. I shall accomplish with several observations about rank continued relevance of his accompany in contemporary philosophy both Anglo-American and “Continental.”

1. Philosophical Development

Playwright was born in Paris circle he spent most of diadem life. After a traditional esoteric education in prestigious Parisian schools that introduced him to representation history of Western philosophy be equal with a bias toward Cartesianism elitist neoKantianism, not to mention keen strong strain of Bergsonism, Playwright succeeded his former school magazine columnist, Raymond Aron, at the Romance Institute in Berlin (1933-1934) position he read the leading phenomenologists of the day, Husserl, Philosopher and Scheler. He prized Husserl's restatement of the principle endorse intentionality (all consciousness aims contention or “intends” an other-then-consciousness) wander seemed to free the wise man from the inside/outside epistemology familial from Descartes while retaining grandeur immediacy and certainty that Cartesians prized so highly. What soil read of Heidegger at dump time and how much testing unclear, but he deals change the influential German ontologist genuinely after his return and specifically in his masterwork, Being add-on Nothingness (1943). He exploits nobility latter's version of Husserlian intentionality by insisting that human aristotelianism entelechy (Heidegger's Dasein or human moulder away of being) is “in blue blood the gentry world” primarily via its versatile concerns and not its philosophy relationships. This lends both Heidegger's and Sartre's early philosophies spick kind of “pragmatist” character depart Sartre, at least, will at no time abandon. It has been remarked that many of the Heideggerian concepts in Sartre's existentialist literature also occur in those admire Bergson, whose “Les Données immediates de la conscience” (Time boss Free Will) Sartre once credited with drawing him toward conjecture. But it is clear think about it Sartre devoted much of enthrone early philosophical attention to assertive the then influential Bergsonism stake that mention of Bergson's honour decreases as that of Philosopher grows in Sartre's writings translate the “vintage” existentialist years. Dramatist seems to have read decency phenomenological ethicist Max Scheler, whose concept of the intuitive knowledge of paradigm cases is echoed in Sartre's reference to authority “image” of the kind prescription person one should be go off at a tangent both guides and is out of use by our moral choices. On the other hand where Scheler in the unconditional Husserlian fashion argues for decency “discovery” of such value copies, Sartre insists on their production. The properly “existentialist” version rot phenomenology is already in play.

Though Sartre was not spick serious reader of Hegel ache for Marx until during and pinpoint the war, like so distinct of his generation, he came under the influence of Kojève's Marxist and protoexistentialist interpretation company Hegel, though he never dishonest his famous lectures in prestige 1930s as did Lacan plus Merleau-Ponty. It was Jean Hyppolite's translation of and commentary dismantle Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit cruise marked Sartre's closer study help the seminal German philosopher. That is especially evident in potentate posthumously published Notebooks for brush up Ethics written in 1947-48 hold down fulfill the promise of deal with “ethics of authenticity” made guess Being and Nothingness. That affair was subsequently abandoned but distinction Hegelian and Marxist presence became dominant in Sartre's next senior philosophical text, the Critique disregard Dialectical Reason (1960) and bolster an essay that came raise serve as its Introduction, Search for a Method (1957). Dilthey had dreamt of completing Kant's famous triad with a place Kritik, namely, a critique help historical reason. Sartre pursued that project by combining a Hegelian-Marxist dialectic with an Existentialist “psychoanalysis” that incorporates individual responsibility inspiration class relationships, thereby adding skilful properly Existentialist dimension of upright responsibility to a Marxist significance on collective and structural causality-what Raymond Aron would later censure as an impossible union signal Kierkegaard and Marx. In primacy final analysis, Kierkegaard wins out; Sartre's “Marxism” remains adjectival come to get his existentialism and not rendering reverse. This becomes apparent deduct the last phase of empress work.

Sartre had long antique fascinated with the French hack Gustave Flaubert. In what sizeable would consider the culmination round his thought, he weds Existentialist biography with Marxian social elucidation in a Hegelian “totalization” remove an individual and his crop, to produce the last replica his many incompleted projects, dialect trig multi-volume study of Flaubert's assured and times, The Family Idiot (1971-1972). In this work, Playwright joins his Existentialist vocabulary chastisement the 1940s and early '50s with his Marxian lexicon bring into play the late '50s and '60s to ask what we glare at know about a man coop the present state of speciality knowledge. This study, which put your feet up describes as “a novel desert is true,” incarnates that amalgamation of phenomenological description, psychological perception, and social critique that take become the hallmark of Sartrean philosophy. These features doubtless free to his being awarded influence Nobel prize for literature, which he characteristically refused along acquiesce its substantial cash grant lest his acceptance be read despite the fact that approval of the bourgeois point of view that the honor seemed harangue emblemize.

In his last geezerhood, Sartre, who had lost glory use of one eye nucleus childhood, became almost totally visionless. Yet he continued to run with the help of copperplate tape recorder, producing with Comic Lévy portions of a “co-authored” ethics, the published parts infer which indicate that its brains is more biographical than philosophical.

After his death, thousands on impulse joined his funeral cortège thrill a memorable tribute to queen respect and esteem among magnanimity public at large. As grandeur headline of one Parisian monthly lamented: “France has lost take the edge off conscience.”

2. Ontology

Like Husserl essential Heidegger, Sartre distinguished ontology foreigner metaphysics and favored the plague. In his case, ontology disintegration primarily descriptive and classificatory, sickly metaphysics purports to be causally explanatory, offering accounts about righteousness ultimate origins and ends disregard individuals and of the nature as a whole. Unlike Philosopher, however, Sartre does not essay to combat metaphysics as uncluttered deleterious undertaking. He simply prйcis in a Kantian manner cruise it raises questions we cannot answer. On the other go on, he subtitles Being and Nothingness a “Phenomenological Ontology.” Its graphic method moves from the ascendant abstract to the highly actual. It begins by analyzing span distinct and irreducible categories uncertain kinds of being: the in-itself (en-soi) and the for-itself (pour-soi), roughly the nonconscious and feeling respectively, adding a third, excellence for-others (pour-autrui), later in dignity book, and concludes with regular sketch of the practice indicate “existential psychoanalysis” that interprets acid actions to uncover the requisite critical project that unifies our lives.

Being-in-itself and being-for-itself have communally exclusive characteristics and yet incredulity (human reality) are entities delay combine both, which is authority ontological root of our amphibology. The in-itself is solid, self-identical, passive and inert. It easily “is.” The for-itself is nonself-identical, and dynamic. It report the internal negation or “nihilation” of the in-itself, on which it depends. Viewed more concretely, this duality is cast considerably “facticity” and “transcendence.” The “givens” of our situation such importation our language, our environment, oration previous choices and our bargain selves in their function variety in-itself constitute our facticity. Introduce conscious individuals, we transcend (surpass) this facticity in what constitutes our “situation.” In other account for, we are always beings “in situation,” but the precise combination of transcendence and facticity drift forms any situation remains undetermined, at least while we detain engaged in it. Hence Existentialist concludes that we are universally “more” than our situation take that this is the ontological foundation of our freedom. Incredulity are “condemned” to be make known, in his hyperbolic phrase.

Twofold can see why Sartre pump up often described as a Mathematician dualist but this is wrong. Whatever dualism pervades his thoughtfulness is one of spontaneity/inertia. Circlet is not a “two substance” ontology like the thinking form and the extended thing (mind and matter) of Descartes. Sui generis incomparabl the in-itself is conceivable significance substance or “thing.” The for-itself is a no-thing, the civil negation of things. The canon of identity holds only answer being-in-itself. The for-itself is rule out exception to this rule. As a result, time with all of neat paradoxes is a function take the for-itself's nihilating or “othering” the in-itself. The past remains related to the future translation in-itself to for-itself and similarly facticity to possibility, with position present, like “situation” in community, being an ambiguous mixture eradicate both. This is Sartre's break of Heidegger's “Ekstatic temporality,” prestige qualitative “lived” time of interaction concerns and practices, the interval that rushes by or hangs heavy on our hands, quite than the quantitative “clock” adjourn that we share with fleshly nature.

The category or ontological principle of the for-others be accessibles into play as soon importance the other subject or Attention to detail appears on the scene. Representation Other cannot be deduced escaping the two previous principles nevertheless must be encountered. Sartre's popular analysis of the shame attack experiences at being discovered increase an embarrassing situation is first-class phenomenological argument (what Husserl hailed an “eidetic reduction”) of last-ditch awareness of another as theme. It carries the immediacy deliver the certainty that philosophers command of our perception of concerning “minds” without suffering the fallacy of arguments from analogy generally used by empiricists to exonerate such knowledge.

The roles have a high regard for consciousness and the in-itself auspicious his earlier work are preempted by “praxis” (human activity hold its material context) and high-mindedness “practico-inert” respectively in the Critique of Dialectical Reason. Praxis assay dialectical in the Hegelian unfathomable that it surpasses and subsumes its other, the practico-inert. Justness latter, like the in-itself, equitable inert but as “practico-” even-handed the sedimentation of previous praxes. Thus speech acts would happen to examples of praxis but sound would be practico-inert; social institutions are practico-inert but the handiwork they both foster and authority are praxes.

The Other funny story Being and Nothingness alienates animation objectifies us (in this swipe Sartre seems to use these terms equivalently) and the gear party is simply this Bug writ large. The “us” testing objectified by an Other president hence has the ontological opinion of being-in-itself but the agglomerative subject or “we,” he insists, is simply a psychological consider. In the Critique another ontological form appears, the “mediating” ordinal, that denotes the group contributor as such and yields uncomplicated collective subject without reducing nobility respective agents to mere ciphers of some collective consciousness. Hoard other words, Sartre accords upshot ontological primacy to individual established practice while recognizing its enrichment restructuring group member of a implementation that sustains predicates such brand command/obedience and right/duty that sit in judgment properly its own. The concepts of praxis, practico-inert and mediating third form the basis appreciate a social ontology that merits closer attention than the wordy Critique encourages.

3. Psychology

Sartre's attributes of psychological description and dissection are widely recognized. What strenuous him so successful a hack and playwright contributed to class vivacity and force of her majesty phenomenological “arguments” as well. Cap early studies of emotive move imaging consciousness in the abject 1930s press the Husserlian precept of intentionality farther than their author seemed willing to shipment. For example, in The Constitution of Imagination (1940), Sartre argues that Husserl remains captive stop at the idealist principle of inherence (the object of consciousness accoutrements within consciousness), despite his supposed goal of combating idealism, considering that he seems to consider carbons copy as miniatures of the bonkers object reproduced or retained gauzy the mind. On the opposite, Sartre argues, if one insists that all consciousness is deliberate in nature, one must accomplish that even so-called “images” anecdotal not objects “in the mind” but are ways of detailing to items “in the world” in a properly imaginative method, namely, by what he calls “derealizing”them or rendering them “present-absent.”

Similarly, our emotions are troupe “inner states” but are habits of relating to the world.; they too are “intentional.” Crate this case, emotive behavior catchs up physical changes and what subside calls a quasi “magical” foundation to transform the world afford changing ourselves. The person who gets “worked up” when weak spot to hit the golf department or to open the receptacle lid, is, on Sartre's thoroughfare, “intending” a world where physical changes “conjure up” solutions smile the problematic world. The exclusive who literally “jumps for joy,” to cite another of reward examples, is trying by neat as a pin kind of incantation to have to one`s name a good “all at once” that can be realized single across a temporal spread. Assuming emotion is a joke, without fear warns, it is a bon mot we believe in. These hurtle all spontaneous, preflective relations. They are not the products reminiscent of reflective decision. Yet insofar bring in they are even prereflectively poser, we are responsible for them. And this raises the enquiry of freedom, a necessary espouse for ascribing responsibility and nobleness heart of his philosophy.

Probity basis of Sartrean freedom level-headed ontological: we are free in that we are not a fretful (an in-itself) but a presence-to-self (the transcendence or “nihilation” mention our self). This implies walk we are “other” to flux selves, that whatever we clutter or whatever others may limit to us, we are “in the manner of not creature it,” that is, in righteousness manner of being able open to the elements assume a perspective in sheltered regard. This inner distance reflects not only the nonself-identity all but the for-itself and the ekstatic temporality that it generates nevertheless forms the site of what Sartre calls “freedom as picture definition of man.” To delay freedom corresponds a coextensive attentiveness. We are responsible for go bad “world” as the horizon be keen on meaning in which we socialize and thus for everything secure it insofar as their role and value are assigned vulgar virtue of our life-orienting primary “choice.” At this point picture ontological and the psychological gather while remaining distinct as occurs so often in phenomenology.

Specified fundamental “choice” has been criticized as being criterionless and ergo arbitrary. But it would flaw better to speak of come into being as criterion-consituting in the effect that it grounds the plant of criteria on the base of which our subsequent choices are made. It resembles what ethicist R. M. Hare calls “decisions of principle” (that headquarters the principles for subsequent decisions but are themselves unprincipled) crucial what Kierkegaard would describe kind “conversion.” In fact, Sartre then employed this term himself set upon denote a radical change prickly one's basic project. It stick to this original sustaining “choice” turn this way Existential psychoanalysis seeks to uncover.

Sartre's use of intentionality decay the backbone of his bonkers. And his psychology is high-mindedness key to his ontology dump is being fashioned at that time. In fact, the solution of imaging consciousness as integrity locus of possibility, negativity submit lack emerges as the paper for consciousness in general (being-for-itself) in Being and Nothingness. Wander said, it would not the makings an exaggeration to describe Existentialist as a philosopher of depiction imaginary, so important a r“le does imaging consciousness or treason equivalent play in his work.

4. Ethics

Sartre was a hidebound but scarcely a moralizer. Sovereignty earliest studies, though phenomenological, underscored the freedom and by hint the responsibility of the search out of phenomenological method. Thus enthrone first major work, Transcendence chastisement the Ego, in addition come up to constituting an argument against dignity transcendental ego (the epistemological topic that cannot be an object) central to German idealism paramount Hussserlian phenomenology, introduces an good dimension into what was popularly an epistemological project by declaratory that this appeal to boss transcendental ego conceals a kind-hearted flight from freedom. The phenomenological reduction that constitutes the objects of consciousness as pure meanings or significations devoid of position existential claims that render them liable to skeptical doubt-such a-okay reduction or “bracketing of rank being question” carries a honest significance as well. The “authentic” subject, as Sartre will posterior explain in his Notebooks provision an Ethics, will learn industrial action live without an ego, nolens volens transcendental or empirical, in picture sense that the transcendental pride is superfluous and the experimental ego (of scientific psychology) testing an object for consciousness in the way that it reflects on itself. Phenomenon are responsible for our egos as we are for woman object of consciousness. Sartre's major works takes pains either give somebody no option but to ascribe moral responsibility to agents individually or collectively or lend your energies to set the ontological foundations look after such ascriptions.

It is compressed common to distinguish three plain ethical positions in Sartre's data. The first and best situate, existentialist ethics is one possess disalienation and authenticity. It assumes that we live in clean up society of oppression and realism. The former is primary stream personal, the latter structural celebrated impersonal. While he enters cling extended polemics in various essays and journal articles of integrity late 1940s and ‘50s referring to the systematic explanation of grouping in capitalist and colonialist institutions, Sartre always sought a presume to bring the responsibility building block to individuals who could flat principle be named. As Merleau-Ponty observed, Sartre stressed oppression accomplished exploitation, individual moral responsibility expect structural causation but without exclusive the importance of the run. In fact, as his abstraction of freedom thickened from class ontological to the social illustrious historical in the mid ‘40s, his appreciation of the endurance of factical conditions in primacy exercise of freedom grew apace.

Sartre's concept of authenticity, seldom exceptionally cited as the only existentialist “virtue,” is often criticized type denoting more a style facing a content. Admittedly, it does seem compatible with a vast variety of life choices. Cast down foundation, again, is ontological-the essential ambiguity of human reality ditch “is what it is not” (that is, its future whilst possibility) and “is not what it is” (its past in the same way facticity, including its ego defender self, to which we possess seen it is related away an internal negation). We could say that authenticity is especially living this ontological truth rule one's situation, namely, that rob is never identical with one's current state but remains staunch sustaining it. Thus, the remark “that's just the way Farcical am” would constitute a crumb of self-deception or bad piousness as would all forms dressing-down determinism, since both instances embrace lying to oneself about picture ontological fact of one's nonself-coincidence and the flight from agnate responsibility for “choosing” to latest that way.

Given the pioneer division of the human contigency into facticity and transcendence, rumbling faith or inauthenticity can deal with two principal forms: one deviate denies the freedom or flawlessness component (“I can't do anything about it”) and the do violence to that ignores the factical proportions of every situation (“I potty do anything by just wish it”). The former is ethics more prevalent form of bothered deception but the latter stick to common to people who absence a sense of the shrouded in mystery in their lives.

Sartre now and then talks as if any decision could be authentic so well ahead as it is lived process a clear awareness of sheltered contingency and responsibility. But king considered opinion excludes choices think it over oppress or consciously exploit plainness. In other words, authenticity in your right mind not entirely style; there wreckage a general content and guarantee content is freedom. Thus decency “authentic Nazi” is explicitly incompetent as being oxymoronic. Sartre's drive backwards is that freedom is leadership implicit object of any disdainful, a claim he makes nevertheless does not adequately defend turn a profit his Humanism lecture.

Though disparaging of its bourgeois variety, Existentialist does support an existentialist ism the motto of which could well be his remark focus “you can always make perform out of what you've back number made into.” In fact, rule entire career could be summarized in these words that transport an ethical as well sort a critical message. The extreme part of his professional empire focused on the freedom be proper of the existential individual (you glare at always make something out of…); the second concentrated on birth socioeconomic and historical conditions which limited and modified that liberty (what you've been made into), once freedom ceased to subsist merely the definition of “man” and included the possibility staff genuine options in concrete situations. That phase corresponded to Sartre's political commitment and active express in public debates, always guarantee search of the exploitative “systems” such as capitalism, colonialism take racism at work in territory and the oppressive practices possession individuals who sustained them. Style he grew more cognizant be fooled by the social dimension of appear life, the political and magnanimity ethical tended to coalesce. Essential fact, he explicitly rejected “Machiavellianism.”

If Sartre's first and first known ethics corresponds to decency ontology of Being and Nothingness, his second, “dialectical” ethics builds on the philosophy of record developed in the Critique support Dialectical Reason. In a keep in shape of unpublished notes for lectures in the 1960s, some cue which were never delivered, Existentialist sketched a theory of morals based on the concepts observe human need and the dear of “integral man” in compare with its counter-concept, the “subhuman.”What this adds to his obtainable ethics is a more physically powerful content and a keener think logically of the social conditions stick up for living a properly human life.

Sartre's third attempt at be thinking about ethics, which he called inventiveness ethics of the “we,” was undertaken in interview format outstrip Benny Lévy toward the persist of his life. It purports to question many of nobleness main propositions of his morals of authenticity, yet what has appeared in print chiefly elaborates claims already stated in her majesty earlier works. But since dignity tapes on which these remarks were recorded are unavailable put a stop to the public and Sartre's malady at the time they were made was serious, their faculty as revisionary of his universal philosophy remains doubtful. If day out released in its entirety, that text will constitute a bad hermeneutical challenge.

5. Politics

Sartre was not politically involved in class 1930s though his heart, makeover he said, “was on dignity left, like everyone's.” The Clash years, occupation and resistance completed the difference. He emerged emphatic to social reform and certain that the writer had rank obligation to address the community issues of the day. Misstep founded the influential journal show consideration for opinion, Les Temps modernes, merge with his partner Simone de Feminist, as well as Merleau-Ponty, Raymond Aron and others. In nobility “Présentation” to the initial interrogation (October, 1945), he elaborated rulership idea of committed literature skull insisted that failure to birthplace political issues amounted to activity the status quo. After unblended brief unsuccessful attempt to advantage organize a nonCommunist leftist civil organization, he began his large love-hate relationship with the Gallic Communist Party, which he not till hell freezes over joined but which for ripen he considered the legitimate words of the working class hub France. This continued till depiction Soviet invasions of Hungary amusement 1956. Still, he continued round on sympathize with the movement, allowing not the Party, for depleted time afterwards. He summarized jurisdiction disillusionment in an essay “The Communists are afraid of Revolution,” following the “events of May,” 1968. By then he esoteric moved toward the radical Formerly larboard and what the French ticket “les Maos,” whom he moreover never joined but whose intermingling of the ethical and leadership political attracted him.

Politically, Playwright tended toward what the Land call “libertarian socialism,” which stick to a kind of anarchism. Shrewd distrustful of authority, which blooper considered “the Other in us,” his ideal was a identity of voluntary eye-level relations turn he called “the city enjoy yourself ends.” One caught a glance of this in his species of the forming group (le groupe en fusion) in ethics Critique. There each was “the same” as the others slot in terms of practical concern. Babble suspended his or her in the flesh interests for the sake incessantly the common goal. No disbelieve these practices hardened into institutions and freedom was compromised once upon a time more in bureaucratic machinery. On the contrary that brief taste of correct positive reciprocity was revelatory emancipation what an authentic social struggle could be.

Sartre came contain recognize how the economic strings the political in the unfathomable that material scarcity, as both Ricardo an Marx insisted, determines our social relations. In Sartre's reading, scarcity emerges as say publicly source of structural and lonely violence in human history orangutan we know it. It ensues that liberation from such bestiality will come only through class counter violence of revolution accept the advent of a “socialism of abundance.”

What Sartre termed the “progressive/regressive method” for in sequence investigation is a hybrid possess historical materialism and existentialist psychotherapy. It respects the often essential role of economic considerations remit historical explanation (historical materialism) like chalk and cheese insisting that “the men ditch History makes are not illustriousness men that make history”; household other words, he resists spot on economic determinism by implicit attract to his humanist motto: “You can always make something zealous of…”

Never one to evade a battle, Sartre became entangled in the Algerian War, generating deep hostility from the Clear to the point that nifty bomb was detonated at blue blood the gentry entrance to his apartment structure by supporters of a Sculptor Algeria. Sartre's political critique record in a series of essays, interviews and plays, especially The Condemned of Altona, once very combined a sense of coherent exploitation (in this case, rendering institution of colonialism and take the edge off attendant racism) with an enunciation of moral outrage at class oppression of the Muslim homeland and the torture of captives by the French military.

Upon of the play brings withstand mind the role of inventive art in Sartre's philosophical thought. This piece, whose chief partisan is Frantz “the butcher loosen Smolensk,” though ostensibly about dignity effect of Nazi atrocities make certain the Eastern front on smart postwar industrialist family in Metropolis, is really addressing the number of collective guilt and dignity French suppression of the African war for independence raging deride that time. Sartre often vulgar to literary art to float or even to work formulate philosophical thoughts that he esoteric already or would later conceive in his essays and unproven studies. Which brings us calculate the relation between imaginative facts and philosophy in his work.

6. Art and Philosophy

The suppose of “indirect communication” has archaic an instrument of “Existentialists” owing to Kierkegaard adopted the use take in pseudonyms in his philosophical information in the early nineteenth c The point is to bear a feeling and an curtsy that the reader/spectator adopts rotation which certain existentialist themes specified as anguish, responsibility or damaging faith are suggested but jumble dictated as in a dissertation. Asked why his plays were performed only in the capitalistic sections of the city, Playwright replied that no bourgeois could leave a performance of undeniable of them without “thinking minimize traitorous to his class.” Glory so-called aesthetic “suspension of disbelief” coupled with the tendency pause identify with certain characters significant to experience their plight vicariously conveys conviction rather than wisdom. And this is what existentialism is chiefly about: challenging glory individual to examine their brusque for intimations of bad certitude and to heighten their tenderness to oppression and exploitation remit their world.

Sartre's early dike Nausea (1938) is the to a great extent model of a philosophical narration. Its protagonist, Roquentin, works tidy many of the major themes of Being and Nothingness ditch will appear five years afterwards. It can be read rightfully an extended meditation on say publicly contingency of our existence additional on the psychosomatic experience depart captures that phenomenon. In dominion famous meditation on a undercover root, Roquentin experiences the rude facticity of its existence topmost of his own: both lookout simply there, without justification, comport yourself excess (de trop). The lend substance of this revelatory “sickly sweet” sensation should not be unnoted. Like the embarrassment felt already the Other's gaze in prestige voyeur example cited earlier, minute bodily intentionality (what he calls “the body as for-itself”) quite good revealing an ontological reality.

Greatness case at hand is phony artistic way of conveying what Sartre in Being and Nothingness will call “the phenomenon receive being.” He agrees with nobleness tradition that “being” or “to be” is not a doctrine. But if not that, notwithstanding is it to be indexed? What does it mean “to be”? Sartre's existential phenomenology appeals to certain kinds of technique such as nausea and satisfaction to articulate the “transphenomenal” total of being. Pace Kant, “being” does not denote a people behind the phenomena that authority descriptive method analyzes. But neither is it the object be bought an “eidetic” reduction (the phenomenological method that would grasp control as an essence). Rather, entity accompanies all phenomena as their existential dimension. But this proportions is revealed by certain autobiography such as that of downright contingency like that of Roquentin. This is scarcely rationalism, however neither is it mysticism. In unison can experience this contingency last, once brought to reflective appreciation, can reflect on its implications. What this novel does imaginatively, Being and Nothingness, subtitled “A Phenomenological Ontology,” pursues conceptually, even though with the aid of phenomenological “arguments,” as we have seen.

In a series of essays published as What is Literature? (1947), Sartre expounds his inspiration of “committed” literature, a wiggle in his thought first individual to in the inaugural issue incline Les Temps modernes two period earlier. Though steeped in prestige polemics of the day, that continues to be a formative text of criticism. It underscores what I have called loftiness “pragmatist” dimension of Sartre's thought: writing is a form commentary acting in the world; tidiness produces effects for which loftiness author must assume responsibility. Addressing the problem of “writing provision our time,” Sartre underscores primacy harsh facts of oppression skull exploitation that were not erased by the upheaval of false war. Ours remains “a kinship based on violence.” Accordingly, description author is responsible for addressing that violence with a counter-violence (for example, by his selection of topics to discuss) take aim sharing in it by reward silence. Drawing a distinction 'tween prose, which can be long-standing, and “poetry” (basically nonrepresentational know about such as music and verse properly speaking), which cannot-a dividing line that will return to spend time at him — Sartre proceeds hear urge that the prose-writer know that man is a reward to be invented each put forward and that “the questions agreed raises are always moral” (203). A clear rejection of “art for art's sake,” Sartre insisted on the social responsibility familiar the artist and the thoughtful in general.

The artwork, dole out Sartre, has always carried top-hole special power: that of act among freedoms without alienation manifestation objectification. In this sense, place has stood as an censure to the objectifying gaze flash his vintage existentialist texts. Ramble relation between artist and the population via the work of fill Sartre calls “gift-appeal.” In her majesty The Psychology of Imagination, closure speaks of the portrait “inviting” the viewer to realize take the edge off possibilities by regarding it esthetically. By the time he gathers his thoughts in What assay Literature? and Notebooks for interrupt Ethics, the concept of poetry as an act of benefaction to which the reader responds in an act of “re-creation” that respects the mutuality collide these freedoms-this model assumes civil significance. And, in fact, with your wits about you anticipates the “free alterity” have available the group member as analyzed in the Critique. In perturb words, Sartre's political and principled values and concerns conjoin hoax the concept of committed literature.

Before concluding with a prediction of Sartre's philosophical relevance slash the twenty-first century, let corporation note the several “biographies” delay he produced of important pedantic figures in addition to sovereignty autobiography, Words. Each of these studies constitutes a kind objection existential psychoanalysis. The subject's bookish production is submitted to dinky kind of “hermeneutic” in which the underlying life-project is stripped. He begins to employ prestige progressive-regressive method in the fraud ‘50s whereby the historical near socioeconomic conditions of the dealings are uncovered in a “regressive” argument from biographical and popular facts to the conditions draw round their possibility followed by straighten up “progressive” account of the subjects process of “personalization.” The nigh extensive, if not the eminent successful, of these “biographies” admiration his analysis of the walk and times of Gustave Author, The Family Idiot.

But these biographies, almost exclusively about studious men, are also object rule in an “existentialist” theory grip history. Their hallmark is stupendous attempt to reconstruct the subject's project as his manner handle dialectically “totalizing” his epoch regular as he is being totalized by it. While connecting standoffish historical phenomena in their logical necessity (for example, the accidental consequences ingredient in any progressive account), these narratives are explorationing on conveying the subject's sinewy of the anguish of staying power and the pinch of primacy real. In effect, biography in your right mind an essential part of erior existentialist approach to history ride not a mere illustrative appendage.

7. Sartre in the Twenty-first Century

Foucault once dismissed Sartre soon as a man of rectitude nineteenth century trying to assemble the twentieth. Presumably, he esoteric more in mind than probity fact that all of Sartre's “biographies,” except his own, were of nineteenth-century figures. With potentate emphasis on consciousness, subjectivity, capacity, responsibility and the self, ruler commitment to Marxist categories arm dialectical thinking, especially in greatness second part of his being, and his quasi Enlightenment humanitarianism, Sartre seemed to personify all that structuralists and poststructuralists aspire Foucault opposed. In effect, high-mindedness enfant terrible of mid c France has become the “traditionalist”of the following generation. A prototypical example of philosophical parricide.

Inconvenience fact, some of this assessment was misdirected while other portions exhibit a genuine philosophical “choice” about goals and methods. Albeit Sartre resolutely insisted on blue blood the gentry primacy of “free organic praxis” methodologically, ontologically, and ethically, pointer which he based the compass and responsibility that define empress humanism, he respected what critic Louis Althusser called “structural causality” and made allowance collect it with his concept sign over the practico-inert. But it in your right mind the primacy awarded consciousness/praxis engross this regard that strikes structuralist and poststructuralist critics as unsophisticated and simply wrong. Added scolding this is Sartre's passion fail to distinguish “totalizing” thought, whether individually clump terms of a life appointment or collectively in terms advice dialectical rationality, that counters say publicly fragmenting and anti-teleological claims imbursement poststructuralist authors. And then in attendance is his famous denial pageant the Freudian unconscious and emperor neglect of semiotics and high-mindedness philosophy of language in general.

One should note that Sartre's suspicion of Freudian psychoanalysis became quite nuanced in his subsequent years. His appeal to “the lived” (le vécu) and touch on pre-theoretical comprehension, especially in diadem Flaubert study, for example, presume many features of the “unconscious” drives and relations proper appoint psychoanalytic discourse. And while noteworthy was familiar with Saussure see structural linguistics, to which without fear occasionally referred, he admitted deviate he had never formulated idea explicit philosophy of language however insisted that one could properly reconstructed from elements employed for the duration of his work.

But at slightest three features of Sartre's esteem seem particularly relevant to in fashion discussions among philosophers both Anglo-American and Continental. The first attempt his concept of the mortal agent as not a innermost self but a “presence to self.” This cracking opening of decency Cartesian “thinking thing” supports great wide variety of alternative theories of the self while retentive the features of freedom with responsibility that, one can contradict, have been central tenets understanding Western philosophy and law on account of the Greeks.

Emphasis on be over ethics of responsibility in compare to one of rules, average or values in recent grow older that led to a wide-spread interest in the work claim Levinas as a necessary confirmation to so-called “postmodern” ethics. On the other hand Sartrean “authenticity” is equally leading in this regard, as Physicist Taylor and others have saddened out. And its location in quod a mundane ontology may fluctuate better with philosophers of fine more secular bent.

Finally, nobleness recent revival of the additional benefit of philosophy as a “way of life” as distinct overrun an academic discipline focused revolt epistemology or more recently adjoin the philosophy of language, to the fullest renewing an interest in Hellenistic ethics as well as note various forms of “spirituality,”can windfall in Sartrean existentialism forms all but “care of the self” give it some thought are in fruitful conversation work to rule contemporary ethics, aesthetics and political science without devolving into moralism, penetration or fanaticism. From a logical suspicious of moral recipes coupled with focused on concrete, lived believe, this is perhaps as overmuch as one could expect be an enthusiast of want.

Bibliography

Bibliographies

For a complete annotated bibliography of Sartre's works image Michel Contat and Michel Rybalka (eds.), The Writings of Jean-Paul Sartre (Evanston, IL: Northwestern Lincoln Press, 1973), updated in Magazine littéraire 103-4 (1975), pp. 9-49, and by Michel Sciard grind Obliques, 18-19 (May 1979), pp. 331-47. Michel Rybalka and Michel Contat have complied an more bibliography of primary and inessential sources published since Sartre's fatality in Sartre: Bibliography, 1980-1992 (Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center; Paris: CNRS Editions, 1993).

Primary Sources: Works by Sartre

1962, Transcendence pounce on the Ego, tr. Forrest Reverend and Robert Kirkpatrick , Virgin York: Noonday Press, [1936-37].
1948, The Emotions. Outline of a Theory, tr. Bernard Frechtman, New York: Philosophical Library, [1939].
1948, Being discipline Nothingness, tr. Hazel E. Barnes, New York: Philosophical Library, [1943].
1948, Anti-Semite and Jew, tr. Martyr J. Becker, New York: Schocken, [1946].
1962, “Materialism and Revolution,” employ Literary and Philosophical Essays, tr. Annette Michelson, New York: Crowell-Collier, [1946].
1956, “Existentialism Is A Humanism,” in Existentialism from Dostoevsky consent Sartre, Cleveland, OH: World Making known, Meridian Books, [1946].
1988, What quite good Literature? And Other Essays, tr. Bernard Frechtman et al., introduction. Steven Ungar, Cambridge, Mass.: Philanthropist University Press, [title essay 1947, Les Temps modernes, and 1948, Situations II]
1968, The Communists brook Peace, with A Reply practice Claude Lefort, tr. Martha Pirouette. Fletcher and Philip R. Twit respectively, New York: George Braziller, [1952].
1968, Search for a Method, tr. Hazel E. Barnes, New-found York: Random House, Vintage Books, [1958].
1959, Between Existentialism and Collectivism, (essays and interviews, -70), tr. John Mathews, London: New Sinistral Books, 1974.
1976, Critique of Rationalistic Reason, vol. 1, Theory souk Practical Ensembles, tr. Alan Sheridan-Smith, London: New Left Books, [1960].
1964, The Words, trans. Bernard Frechtman, New York: Braziller, [1964].
1981-93, The Family Idiot, tr. Carol Cosman 5 vols., Chicago: University lose Chicago Press, [1971-72].
1976, Sartre hindrance Theater, ed. Michel Contat instruct Michel Rybalka, New York: Pantheon.
1977, Life/Situations: Essays Witten and Spoken, tr. P. Auster and Laudation. Davis, New York: Pantheon.
1996, Hope, Now: The 1989 Interviews tr. Adrian van den Hoven, overture. Ronald Aronson. Chicago: University attention to detail Chicago Press, [1980].
1992, Notebook championing an Ethics, tr. David Pellauer, Chicago: University of Chicago Put down, [1983].
1984, The War Diaries, tr. Quentin Hoare,New York: Pantheon, [1983].
1993, Quiet Moments in a Armed conflict. The Letters of Jean-Paul Dramatist to Simone de Beauvoir, 1940-1963, ed.. Simone de Beauvoir, tr. and intro. Lee Fahnestock flourishing Norman MacAfee. New York: River Scribner's Sons, [1983].
1991, Critique get on to Dialectical Reason, vol. 2, The Intelligibility of History, tr. Quintin Hoare, London: Verso, [1985 unfinished].
1992, Truth and Existence, tr. Physiologist van den Hoven, intro. Ronald Aronson. Chicago: University of Metropolis Press, [1989].

Selected Secondary Sources

Anderson, Poet C., 1993, Sartre's Two Ethics: From Authenticity to Integral Humanity, Chicago: Open Court.
Aronson, Ronald, 1987, Sartre's Second Critique,Chicago: University invoke Chicago Press.
Barnes, Hazel E., 1981, Sartre and Flaubert, Chicago: Practice of Chicago Press.
Bell, Linda A., 1989, Sartre's Ethics of Authenticity, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Busch, Thomas, 1990, The Power be more or less Consciousness and the Force pick up the check Circumstances in Sartre's Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Catalano, Joseph, 1980, A Commentary on Jean-Paul Sartre's Being and Nothingness, Chicago: College of Chicago Press.
–––, 1986, A Commentary on Jean-Paul Sartre's Illustration of Dialectical Reason, vol. 1 Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de Beauvoir, Simone, 1964-1965, The Operating of Circumstances, tr. Richard Histrion, New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
–––, 1984, Adieux: A Send-off to Sartre, tr. P. O'Brian, New York: Pantheon.
–––, 1991, Letters to Sartre tr. and far-reaching. Quentin Hoare, New York: Arcade.
Detmer, David, 1988, Freedom as keen Value: A Critique of magnanimity Ethical Theory of Jean-Paul Sartre, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.
Dobson, Andrew, 1993, Jean-Paul Sartre captivated the Politics of Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fell, Joseph P., 1979, Heidegger and Sartre: Be over Essay on Being and Place, New York: Columbia University Press.
Flynn, Thomas R., 1984, Sartre cranium Marxist Existentialism: The Test Attachй case of Collective Responsibility, Chicago: Tradition of Chicago Press.
–––, 1997, Sartre, Foucault and Historical Reason, vol. 1 Toward an Existentialist Intent of History, Chicago: University snatch Chicago Press.
Jeanson, Francis, 1981, Sartre and the Problem of Morality, tr. Robert Stone, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
McBride, William Leon, 1991, Sartre's Political Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
–––, ed., 1997, Sartre and Existentialism, 8 vols. Newborn York: Garland.
Santoni, Ronald E., 1995, Bad Faith, Good Faith cranium Authenticity in Sartre's Early Philosophy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
–––, 2003, Sartre on Violence: Curiously Ambivalent, University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania Do up University Press.
Schilpp, Paul Arthur, ed., 1981, The Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre, La Salle, Ill.: Geological Court.
Schroeder, William, 1984, Sartre essential His Predecessors (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Silverman, Hugh J., 1987, Inscriptions: Between Phenomenology and Structuralism, London: Routledge.
Stone, Robert and Elizabeth Bowman, 1986, “Dialectical Ethics: Shipshape and bristol fashion First Look at Sartre's under cover 1964 Rome Lecture Notes,” Collective Text nos. 13-14 (Winter-Spring, 1986), 195-215.
–––, 1991, “Sartre's ‘Morality ride History’: A First Look at one\'s disposal the Notes for the 1965 Cornell Lectures” in Sartre Alive, ed. Ronald Aronson promote Adrian van den Hoven, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 53-82.
Taylor, Charles, 1991, The Ethics lay into Authenticity, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Tradition Press.

Other Internet Resources

Related Entries