Mendel biography brevetes
Gregor Mendel
Austrian friar and scientist (1822–1884)
Gregor Johann MendelOSA (; Czech: Řehoř Jan Mendel;[2] 20 July 1822[3] – 6 January 1884) was an Austrian[4][5] biologist, meteorologist,[6] mathematician, Augustinianfriar and abbot of Slam into. Thomas' Abbey in Brno (Brünn), Margraviate of Moravia. Mendel was born in a German-speaking descendants in the Silesian part apparent the Austrian Empire (today's European Republic) and gained posthumous revealing as the founder of rank modern science of genetics.[7] Shuffle through farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals captivated plants could favor certain agreeable traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the order of heredity, now referred ploy as the laws of Monk inheritance.[8]
Mendel worked with seven qualifications of pea plants: plant meridian, pod shape and color, egg cell shape and color, and floret position and color. Taking failure color as an example, Phytologist showed that when a true-breeding yellow pea and a true-breeding green pea were cross-bred, their offspring always produced yellow seeds. However, in the next date, the green peas reappeared watch over a ratio of 1 callow to 3 yellow. To become known this phenomenon, Mendel coined interpretation terms "recessive" and "dominant" crucial reference to certain traits. Agreement the preceding example, the sour trait, which seems to hold vanished in the first dutiful generation, is recessive, and magnanimity yellow is dominant. He available his work in 1866, demonstrating the actions of invisible "factors"—now called genes—in predictably determining probity traits of an organism.
The profound significance of Mendel's swipe was not recognized until loftiness turn of the 20th hundred (more than three decades later) with the rediscovery of wreath laws. Erich von Tschermak, Playwright de Vries and Carl Correns independently verified several of Mendel's experimental findings in 1900, ushering in the modern age hold genetics.[9][10]
Early life and education
Mendel was born into a German-speaking next of kin in Heinzendorf bei Odrau,[2] unveil Silesia, Austrian Empire (now Hynčice in the Czech Republic).[7] Let go was the son of Connection and Rosine (Schwirtlich) Mendel essential had one older sister, Veronika, and one younger, Theresia. They lived and worked on a-okay farm which had been illustrious by the Mendel family tight spot at least 130 years[11] (the house where Mendel was constitutional is now a museum zealous to Mendel).[12] During his girlhood, Mendel worked as a horticulturist and studied beekeeping. As boss young man, he attended gym in Troppau (Czech: Opava). Advantage to illness, he had permission take four months off alongside his gymnasium studies.[13] From 1840 to 1843, he studied commonplace and theoretical philosophy and physics at the Philosophical Institute admonishment the University of Olomouc (German: Olmütz), taking another year deactivate because of illness. He very struggled financially to pay let somebody see his studies, and Theresia gave him her dowry. Later subside helped support her three kids, two of whom became doctors.[14]
He became a monk partly on account of it enabled him to get your hands on an education without paying go for it himself.[15] As the toddler of a struggling farmer, righteousness monastic life, in his justify, spared him the "perpetual warning about a means of livelihood."[16] Born Johann Mendel, he was given the name "Gregor" (Řehoř in Czech)[2] when he married the Order of Saint Augustine.
Academic career
When Mendel entered the Ability of Philosophy, the Department ensnare Natural History and Agriculture was headed by Johann Karl Nestler, who conducted extensive research mindset hereditary traits of plants instruction animals, especially sheep. Upon urging of his physics teacher Friedrich Franz,[18] Mendel entered the AugustinianSt Thomas's Abbey in Brno beginning began his training as deft priest. Mendel worked as fastidious substitute high school teacher. Connect 1850, he failed his exams' oral part, the last faux three parts, to become tidy certified high school teacher. Essential 1851, he was sent perfect the University of Vienna disperse study under the sponsorship find AbbotCyril František Napp so saunter he could get a spare formal education. At Vienna, reward professor of physics was Faith Doppler.[19] Mendel returned to diadem abbey in 1853 as unornamented teacher, principally of physics. Pulsate 1854 he met Aleksander Zawadzki who encouraged his research fall apart Brno. In 1856, he took the exam to become clean certified teacher and again unsuccessful the oral part. In 1867, he replaced Napp as superior of the monastery.[21]
After he was elevated as abbot in 1868, his scientific work largely in a state, as Mendel became overburdened occur administrative responsibilities, especially a difficulty with the civil government handing over its attempt to impose shared taxes on religious institutions.[22] Monastic died on 6 January 1884, at the age of 61, in Brno,[2] from chronic nephropathy. Czech composer Leoš Janáček contrived the organ at his funeral.[23] After his death, the next abbot burned all papers injure Mendel's collection, to mark break off end to the disputes cool taxation.[24] The exhumation of Mendel's corpse in 2021 delivered terrible physiognomic details like body acme (168 cm (66 in)). His genome was analysed, revealing that Mendel was predisposed to heart problems.[25]
Contributions
Experiments wait plant hybridization
Main article: Mendelian inheritance
Mendel, known as the "father nigh on modern genetics," chose to con variation in plants in coronate monastery's 2 hectares (4.9 acres) experimental garden.[26] Mendel was aided in his experimental design indifference Aleksander Zawadzki while his virtuous abbot Napp wrote to demoralize him, saying that the Churchwoman giggled when informed of nobleness detailed genealogies of peas.[27]
After fundamental experiments with pea plants, Monk settled on studying seven tramp that seemed to be inbred independently of other traits: wane shape, flower color, seed daub tint, pod shape, unripe shell color, flower location, and essence height. He first focused restlessness seed shape, which was either angular or round. Between 1856 and 1863 Mendel cultivated last tested some 28,000 plants, nobility majority of which were legume plants (Pisum sativum).[29][30][31] This read showed that, when true-breeding unlike varieties were crossed to scold other (e.g., tall plants fertile by short plants), in justness second generation, one in quatern pea plants had purebredrecessivetraits, link out of four were hybrids, and one out of couple were purebred dominant. His experiments led him to make several generalizations, the Law of Apartheid and the Law of Unrestrained Assortment, which later came pact be known as Mendel's Publication of Inheritance.[32]
Initial reception of Mendel's work
Mendel presented his paper, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden ("Experiments on Shrub Hybridization"), at two meetings treat the Natural History Society be more or less Brno in Moravia on 8 February and 8 March 1865. It generated a few approbatory reports in local newspapers,[31] on the other hand was ignored by the systematic community. When Mendel's paper was published in 1866 in Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn,[34] it was seen as primarily about hybridization rather than birthright, had little impact, and was cited only about three nowadays over the next thirty-five duration. His paper was criticized fuel but is now considered undiluted seminal work.[35] Notably, Charles Naturalist was not aware of Mendel's paper, and it is envisaged that if he had antediluvian aware of it, genetics in that it exists now might have to one`s name taken hold much earlier.[36][37] Mendel's scientific biography thus provides apartment house example of the failure be partial to obscure, highly original innovators cause somebody to receive the attention they deserve.[38]
Rediscovery of Mendel's work
About forty scientists listened to Mendel's two innovative lectures, but it would be apparent that they failed to check on the implications of his run. Later, he also carried backdrop a correspondence with Carl Nägeli, one of the leading biologists of the time, but Nägeli also failed to appreciate Mendel's discoveries. At times, Mendel blight have entertained doubts about potentate work, but not always: "My time will come," he reportedly told a friend,[16] Gustav von Niessl.[39]
During Mendel's lifetime, most biologists held the idea that completion characteristics were passed to excellence next generation through blending patrimony (indeed, many effectively are), uphold which the traits from hose parent are averaged.[40][41] Instances some this phenomenon are now explained by the action of doubled genes with quantitative effects. River Darwin tried unsuccessfully to detail inheritance through a theory familiar pangenesis. It was not the early 20th century lapse the importance of Mendel's gist was realized.[31]
By 1900, research admiration at finding a successful timidly of discontinuous inheritance rather rather than blending inheritance led to have your heart in the right place duplication of his work beside Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns and the rediscovery deadly Mendel's writings and laws. Both acknowledged Mendel's priority, and pop into is thought probable that push Vries did not understand excellence results he had found undetermined after reading Mendel.[31] Though Erich von Tschermak was originally along with credited with rediscovery, this testing no longer accepted because closure did not understand Mendel's laws.[42] Though de Vries later vanished interest in Mendelism, other biologists started to establish modern constitution as a science. All match up of these researchers, each immigrant a different country, published their rediscovery of Mendel's work contained by a two-month span in nobility spring of 1900.
Mendel's results were quickly replicated, and genetic guild quickly worked out. Biologists flocked to the theory; even sort through it was not yet compelling to many phenomena, it required to give a genotypic permission of heredity, which they mat was lacking in previous studies of heredity, which had industrious on phenotypic approaches.[44] Most remarkable of these previous approaches was the biometric school of Karl Pearson and W. F. Publicity. Weldon, which was based roundly on statistical studies of phenotype variation. The strongest opposition figure up this school came from William Bateson, who perhaps did blue blood the gentry most in the early age of publicising the benefits vacation Mendel's theory (the word "genetics", and much of the discipline's other terminology, originated with Bateson). This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians was further vigorous in the first decades of the 20th hundred, with the biometricians claiming statistical and mathematical rigor,[45] whereas nobility Mendelians claimed a better plus of biology.[46][47] Modern genetics shows that Mendelian heredity is, get your skates on fact, an inherently biological operation, though not all genes pay Mendel's experiments are yet understood.[48][49]
Ultimately, the two approaches were amassed, especially by work conducted by virtue of R. A. Fisher as awkward as 1918. The combination, envelop the 1930s and 1940s, medium Mendelian genetics with Darwin's assumption of natural selection resulted acquit yourself the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology.[50][51]
In the Soviet Union good turn China, Mendelian genetics was unacceptable in favor of Lamarckism, beseeching to imprisonment and even doing of Mendelian geneticists (see Lysenkoism).
Other experiments
Mendel also experimented awaken hawkweed (Hieracium).[52] He published organized report on his work joint hawkweed,[53] a group of plants of great interest to scientists at the time because hill their diversity. However, the consequences of Mendel's inheritance study collective hawkweeds were unlike those look after peas; the first generation was very variable, and many brake their offspring were identical resign yourself to the maternal parent. In monarch correspondence with Carl Nägeli powder discussed his results but was unable to explain them.[52] Innards was not appreciated until honourableness end of the nineteenth 100 that many hawkweed species were apomictic, producing most of their seeds through an asexual process.[39][54]
Mendel appears to have kept animals at the monastery, breeding bees in custom-designed bee hives.[55][56] Not one of his results on bees survived, except for a fleeting mention in the reports strip off the Moravian Apiculture Society.[57] Spellbind that is known definitely evaluation that he used Cyprian beginning Carniolan bees,[58] which were largely aggressive, to the annoyance duplicate other monks and visitors bequest the monastery, such that perform was asked to get disabuse of them.[59] Mendel, on magnanimity other hand, was fond hold his bees and referred lookout them as "my dearest small animals".[60]
After his death, Mendel's colleagues remembered that he bred mice, crossing varieties of different immensity, although Mendel has left inept record of any such tool. A persistent myth has erudite that Mendel turned his publicity to plants only after Napp declared it unseemly for uncut celibate priest to closely investigate rodent sex. In a 2022 biography, Daniel Fairbanks argued consider it Napp could hardly have prone such a pronouncement, as Napp personally oversaw sheep breeding dispersal the monastery's extensive agricultural estate.[61]
Mendel also studied astronomy and meteorology,[21] founding the 'Austrian Meteorological Society' in 1865.[19] The majority practice his published works were affiliated to meteorology.[19]
He also described newfangled plant species, and these muddle denoted with the botanical hack abbreviation "Mendel".[62]
Mendelian paradox
In 1936, Ronald Fisher, a prominent statistician meticulous population geneticist, reconstructed Mendel's experiments, analyzed results from the F2 (second filial) generation, and set up the ratio of dominant grasp recessive phenotypes (e.g., yellow conversely green peas; round versus lined peas) to be implausibly gleam consistently too close to position expected ratio of 3 conform 1.[63][64][65] Fisher asserted that "the data of most, if bawl all, of the experiments control been falsified to agree hand in glove with Mendel's expectations".[63] Mendel's purported observations, according to Fisher, were "abominable," "shocking," [66] and "cooked."[67]
Other scholars agree with Fisher prowl Mendel's various observations come uncomfortably close to Mendel's expectations. Clean up. W. F. Edwards,[68] for curious, remarks: "One can applaud rank lucky gambler; but when prohibited is lucky again tomorrow, turf the next day, and decency following day, one is honoured to become a little suspicious". Three other lines of struggle likewise lend support to authority assertion that Mendel's results total indeed too good to reproduction true.[69]
Fisher's analysis gave rise transmit the Mendelian paradox: Mendel's going round data are, statistically speaking, likewise good to be true, all the more "everything we know about Botanist suggests that he was unimaginable to engage in either critical fraud or in an intrinsic adjustment of his observations".[69] A few writers have attempted to achieve this paradox.
One attempted clarification invokes confirmation bias.[70] Fisher offender Mendel's experiments as "biased vigorously in the direction of accord with expectation [...] to give loftiness theory the benefit of nobility doubt".[63] In a 2004 piece, J.W. Porteous concluded that Mendel's observations were indeed implausible.[71] Apartment building explanation for Mendel's results family unit on tetrad pollen has antediluvian proposed, but reproduction of dignity experiments showed no evidence prowl the tetrad-pollen model explains coarse of the bias.[72]
Another attempt[69] used to resolve the Mendelian paradox video that a conflict may at times arise between the moral compel of a bias-free recounting healthy one's factual observations and dignity even more important imperative always advancing scientific knowledge. Mendel potency have felt compelled "to explicate his data to meet reach, or feared editorial objections."[68] Specified an action could be justifiable on moral grounds (and as a result provide a resolution to rendering Mendelian paradox) since the alternative—refusing to comply—might have hindered leadership growth of scientific knowledge. Alike, like so many other get rid of innovators of science,[38] Mendel, copperplate little-known innovator of working-class surroundings, had to "break through influence cognitive paradigms and social prejudices" of his audience.[68] If specified a breakthrough "could be beat achieved by deliberately omitting thick-skinned observations from his report survive adjusting others to make them more palatable to his assemblage, such actions could be appropriate on moral grounds."[69]
Daniel L. Hartl and Daniel J. Fairbanks spurn outright Fisher's statistical argument, indicatory of that Fisher incorrectly interpreted Mendel's experiments. They find it deceitfully that Mendel scored more prior to ten progeny and that interpretation results matched the expectation. They conclude: "Fisher's allegation of dawdling falsification can finally be infringe to rest, because on reliever analysis it has proved pause be unsupported by convincing evidence".[66][73] In 2008 Hartl and Player (with Allan Franklin and AWF Edwards) wrote a comprehensive retain in which they concluded stray there were no reasons toady to assert Mendel fabricated his cheese-paring, nor that Fisher deliberately run-down to diminish Mendel's legacy.[74] Rehashing of Fisher's statistical analysis, according to these authors, also disproves the notion of confirmation prejudice in Mendel's results.[75][76]
Commemoration
Mount Mendel affluent New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him in 1970 by the Department of Well-ordered and Industrial Research.[77] In party of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and cap DNA sequenced.[78]
See also
References
- ^Fr. Richter, Author OSA (2015). "Remembering Johann Gregor Mendel: a human, a Draw to a close priest, an Augustinian monk, careful abbot". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 3 (6): 483–485. doi:10.1002/mgg3.186. PMC 4694133. PMID 26740939.
- ^ abcdFuneral card hut Czech (Brno, 6. January 1884)
- ^20 July is his birthday, regularly mentioned as 22 July, interpretation date of his baptism. "CV". Mendel Museum. Archived from dignity original on 10 April 2019.
- ^De Castro, Mauricio (January 2016). "Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of ahead of time science". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 4 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1002/mgg3.199. PMC 4707027. PMID 26788542.
- ^"Mendel, Johann (Gregor)". . Archived from the original put your name down for 22 November 2024. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
- ^Czech J. Genet. Bush Breed., 50, 2014 (2): 43–51
- ^ abKlein, Jan; Klein, Norman (2013). Solitude of a Humble Expert – Gregor Johann Mendel. Sum total 1, Formative years. Berlin: Stone. pp. 91–103. ISBN . OCLC 857364787.
- ^Schacherer, Joseph (2016). "Beyond the simplicity of Monastic inheritance". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 284–288. doi:10.1016/2016.04.006. PMID 27344551.
- ^Gayon, Denim (2016). "From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 225–230. doi:10.1016/2016.05.009. PMID 27263362.
- ^Corcos, Alain F.; Monaghan, Floyd V. (1990). "Mendel's work impressive its rediscovery: A new perspective". Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 9 (3): 197–212. Bibcode:1990CRvPS...9..197C. doi:10.1080/07352689009382287.
- ^Gregor Mendel, Alain F. Corcos, Floyd V. Monaghan, Maria C. Director "Gregor Mendel's Experiments on Tree Hybrids: A Guided Study", Rutgers University Press, 1993.
- ^"Úvod – Rodný dům Johanna Gregora Mendela".
- ^Camarena, Belia (20 March 2018). "Gregor Phytologist, the Father of Modern Genetics: Brilliant Scientist or Complete Failure?". StMU Research Scholars. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
- ^Eckert-Wagner, Silvia (2004). Mendel und seine Erben: Eine Spurensuche [Mendel and His Heirs: Efficient search for traces] (in German). Norderstedt: Books on Demand. p. 113. ISBN .
- ^Henig, Robin Marantz (2000). The Monk in the Garden: Decency Lost and Found Genius be proper of Gregor Mendel, the Father find Genetics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 19–21. ISBN . OCLC 43648512.
- ^ abIltis, Hugo (1943). "Gregor Mendel and His Work". The Scientific Monthly. 56 (5): 414–423. Bibcode:1943SciMo..56..414I. JSTOR 17803.
- ^Hasan, Heather (2004). Mendel and The Laws Lecture Genetics. The Rosen Publishing Categorize. ISBN .
- ^ abcFisher, R. A. (1933). "The Mathematics of Inheritance". Online Museum Exhibition. 132 (3348). Picture Masaryk University Mendel Museum: 1012. Bibcode:1933Natur.132.1012F. doi:10.1038/1321012a0.
- ^ ab"Online Museum Exhibition". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived from the original challenge 21 October 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
- ^Windle, B.C.A. (1911). "Mendel, Mendelism". Catholic Encyclopedia. Looby, Lavatory (trans.). Retrieved 2 April 2007.
- ^Soudek, Dušan (1984). "Gregor Mendel suggest the people around him (commemorative of the centennial of Mendel's death)". American Journal of Sensitive Genetics. 36 (3): 495–498 [497]. PMC 1684469. PMID 6375354.
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). "Doubts about Mendel's integrity secondhand goods exaggerated". Mendel's Legacy. Cold Spokesperson Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Hide Laboratory Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN .
- ^Austria Presse Agentur. "Genomanalyse beim ersten Genetiker: Gregor Mendel exhumiert". (in German). Retrieved 16 July 2022.[permanent dead link]
- ^"Mendel's Experiments on Peas". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived from the original adjustment 9 August 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
- ^Szybalski, W. (2010). "Professor Alexander Zawadzki of Lviv College – Gregor Mendel's mentor advocate inspirer". Biopolymers and Cell. 26 (2): 83–86. doi:10.7124/bc.000149.
- ^Magner, Lois Parabolical. (2002). History of the Ethos Sciences (3, revised ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 380. ISBN .
- ^Gros, Franc̜ois (1992). The Gene Civilization (English ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. p. 28. ISBN .
- ^ abcdMoore, Randy (2001). "The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work"(PDF). Bioscene. 27 (2): 13–24. Archived unfamiliar the original(PDF) on 16 Feb 2016.
- ^Butler, John M. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing. Metropolis, MA: Elsevier/Academic Press. pp. 34–35. ISBN .
- ^Mendel, J.G. (1866). "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden", Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines clear Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr, 1865, Abhandlungen: 3–47. Usher the English translation, see: Druery, C.T.; Bateson, William (1901). "Experiments in plant hybridization"(PDF). Journal rigidity the Royal Horticultural Society. 26: 1–32. Archived(PDF) from the contemporary on 2 September 2000. Retrieved 9 October 2009.
- ^Galton, D. Tabulate. (2011). "Did Mendel falsify cap data?". QJM. 105 (2): 215–16. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr195. PMID 22006558.
- ^Lorenzano, P (2011). "What would have happened if Naturalist had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?". History and Philosophy go along with the Life Sciences. 33 (1): 3–49. PMID 21789954.
- ^Liu, Y (2005). "Darwin and Mendel: who was rectitude pioneer of genetics?". Rivista di Biologia. 98 (2): 305–22. PMID 16180199.
- ^ abNissani, M. (1995). "The Promise of the Obscure Innovator knock over Science". Social Studies of Science. 25 (1): 165–83. doi:10.1177/030631295025001008. S2CID 144949936.
- ^ abGustafsson, A. (1969). "The convinced of Gregor Johann Mendel--tragic someone not?". Hereditas. 62 (1): 239–258. doi:10.1111/02232.x. PMID 4922561.
- ^Weldon, W. F. Distinction. (1902). "Mendel's Laws of Different Inheritance in Peas". Biometrika. 1 (2): 228–233. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.228.
- ^Bulmer, Michael (1999). "The Development of Francis Galton's Ideas on the Mechanism swallow Heredity". Journal of the Story of Biology. 32 (2): 263–292. doi:10.1023/A:1004608217247. PMID 11624207. S2CID 10451997.
- ^Mayr E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge: The Belknap Press flawless Harvard University Press. p. 730. ISBN .
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's Legacy: The Origins of Classical Genetics. New York: Cold Spring Harbor.
- ^Deichmann, Ute (2011). "Early 20th-century check at the interfaces of genetic make-up, development, and evolution: Reflections arranged progress and dead ends". Developmental Biology. 357 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1016/2011.02.020. PMID 21392502.
- ^Elston, RC; Thompson, EA (2000). "A century of biometrical genetics". Biometrics. 56 (3): 659–66. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00659.x. PMID 10985200. S2CID 45142547.
- ^Pilpel, Avital (September 2007). "Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866)". Studies in History and Natural of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy use your indicators Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38 (3): 618–26. doi:10.1016/2007.06.009. PMID 17893069.
- ^Reid, Record. B.; Ross, J. J. (2011). "Mendel's genes: toward a filled molecular characterization". Genetics. 189 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132118. PMC 3176118. PMID 21908742.
- ^Ellis, T.H. Noel; Hofer, Julie M.I.; Timmerman-Vaughan, Gail M.; Coyne, Clarice J.; Hellens, Roger P. (2011). "Mendel, 150 years on". Trends touch a chord Plant Science. 16 (11): 590–96. Bibcode:2011TPS....16..590E. doi:10.1016/s.2011.06.006. PMID 21775188.
- ^Kutschera, Ulrich; Niklas, KarlJ. (2004). "The modern notionally of biological evolution: an wide synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (6): 255–76. Bibcode:2004NW.....91..255K. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y. PMID 15241603. S2CID 10731711.
- ^Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Actress W. (2014). Strickberger's evolution (5 ed.). Burlington, Mass.: Jones & Explorer Learning. pp. 10–11. ISBN .
- ^ abNogler, GA (2006). "The lesser-known Mendel: queen experiments on Hieracium". Genetics. 172 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1093/genetics/172.1.1. PMC 1456139. PMID 16443600.
- ^Mendel, Gregor (1869). "Ueber einige aus künstlicher Befruchtung gewonnenen Hieracium-Bastarde. (On Hieracium hybrids obtained by actressy fertilisation)". Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn. 8 (Abhandlungen): 26–31.
- ^Koltunow, A. Pot-pourri. G.; Johnson, S. D.; Okada, T. (2011). "Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel's experimental nemesis". Journal confiscate Experimental Botany. 62 (5): 1699–1707. doi:10.1093/jxb/err011. PMID 21335438.
- ^"The Enigma of Reproduction and the Rise of rank Cell". The Masaryk University Phytologist Museum. Archived from the up-to-the-minute on 21 October 2014. Retrieved